Beating the Heat: Evaporative Coolers vs. Refrigeration
(Reprinted from the April-June, 2010, Rincon Group Newsletter)
by Roy Emrick and Russell Lowes
For several years, a business columnist at the Arizona Daily Star regularly berated evaporative coolers as water wasters and outmoded technology. He said refrigeration was the way to go in the modern world. Many readers disagreed with him but they gave only qualitative arguments. We decided to see if we could find some quantitative data to compare the two systems. We put together our data on our own rooftop systems. One of us (Roy) has had only evaporative coolers since he came to Tucson in 1960. The second author (Russell) has a combined evap/air conditioner/heat pump unit.
Russell’s combo "piggyback" evap-A/C heatpump system
Also, as you probably know, Tucson’s water contains lots of dissolved minerals. These minerals precipitate out on the cooler pads eventually making them useless. To combat this problem, the more modern coolers have pumps that empty out the water tank every eight or twelve hours of operation, thereby purging the salty water. This is good for cooler pad life but uses more water. Because this latter type of cooler is more common today, we included the use of this pump in our experiment.
Refrigeration or "air conditioning" systems are based on the Joule-Thomson effect: a gas cools when it expands. For example, when you let air out of a tire, it is cool. Here a mechanical pump compresses a gas (usually Freon), which warms it. It then goes through a copper coil where air cools it until it condenses. The resulting liquid then flows through a small opening and expands, causing it to cool, and chill your house.
In the table below, we summarize the energy and water consumption of the two types of coolers. Since our electric bills are usually the first concern, we start there. Our data in column 2 are taken from a number of research papers. There is an amazing spread of water usage, almost a factor of ten, in usage for similar houses, so we have used mid-range values that would apply to Tucson. The $0.113/kWh (kilowatt hours) used in Column 3 for calculating the energy cost comes from dividing Roy’s last July bill of $42.91 by the 380 kWh used.
Next we determined the cost of the water used by the evap cooler. Tucson water has a lower rate ($1.39/ccf) for less than 15 ccf (hundred cubic feet - 748 gallons) and much more ($5.14/ccf) for over 15 ccf. We assumed that folks would use some amount of water that fell into the higher category, so estimated $3/ccf as a reasonable average. This results in the total cost for the two systems in Column 9.
The trickier part was figuring the total water usage, Columns 4, 6 and 9. It may come as a surprise, but air conditioning or heat pump refrigeration is not a water-free process. Water - lots of it - is used in the generation of electricity. You may have noted clouds of steam coming from the cooling towers at power plants. Much of the cooling water is recycled, but even so about 0.5 gallon of water is used to generate one kWh of electrical energy at Tucson Electric’s power plants.
Hydropower is even more water consumptive, as a huge amount of water evaporates from the reservoir behind the power dam. Lakes Meade and Powell lose almost a million acre feet per year and although some of this must be budgeted to irrigation, recreation, and flood control, at least 4 gallons/kWh could be attributed to hydropower. Nuclear power is even more water intensive than coal plants. Since we are on the Western Power Grid, it is difficult to say what fraction of our local power comes from which source. Once again, we used an average, and calculated 0.8gal/ kWh as a reasonable estimate.
Table summarizing the energy and water consumption of the two types of coolers
The Table reflects these assumptions on energy and water consumption. It also compares the total energy and water consumption for a typical home in the Southwestern deserts. Depending on the assumptions, the results are quite variable. For example, if you predict that the energy costs per kilowatt-hour in this area are going to increase, which many energy analysts project, then the evap cooler gains favor. If you plan to buy a super-efficient A/C, then this option gains favor. We did assume a high efficiency A/C, but there are even higher efficiency units becoming available.
There are also other factors not considered in this analysis. For example, some people do better, health-wise, with an evaporative cooler, while others do better with A/ C. All air contains bacteria, mold and fungi. These microorganisms can even be beneficial for your health, but some people have problems with the very dry air an A/C produces, while others have problems with the moister air an evap produces. To most people it does not seem to make that much difference, except that in the driest conditions, many people say they like the moisture of the evap for their skin, hair and overall health. Ultimately, the data seem to suggest that environmentally evaporative is the better choice, but using A/C during the most humid times, and using the evap the rest of the time is still a responsible option. Perhaps the most important lesson is not to use either unnecessarily - turn down the thermostat. That didn’t used to be an option for the old evaportative coolers - they were either on or off - with a high or low option. The modern evaps, however, offer affordable thermostats which pre-wet your pads, turn the system on and off like an A/C thermostat, and allow you to program the hours of startup and shutdown. These thermostats let you further reduce your water and energy consumption.
As for initial cost of system, and of repairs, refrigeration systems are much higher in cost than evaps. Evaps take more maintenance, but the routine maintenance is significantly lower in cost than the infrequent maintenance needs for refrigeration units.
What Can Homeownders Do to Reduce Energy and Water Consumption in Cooling Their Homes and Businesses?
Homeowners have several options if they want to reduce energy and water consumption and still cool their homes during our hot summer months. If you are willing, like Roy, to weather the humidity, then the lowest cost option is the good ol’ evaporative cooler. If you aren’t quite that tough, you can do what Russell has done and install a "piggyback" unit, or cooler/heat-pump-A/C combo. This allows you to use the evaporative cooler during the drier months of April through June and September through October. It also allows you to use the evap during the drier parts of the days July through August. However, when the humidity increases and evap is no longer cooling efficiently, you can turn it off and the A/C on. If you do get a piggyback, it is important to get a "barometric damper" which swings freely to open to whichever system you turn on. These allow you to not do anything but shut one system off and the other on. If you have a piggyback, you never want to run both systems at once (see picture of piggyback).
Home insulation is also important, especially with refrigeration. Some of the wide variations in experimental results for cooler energy use are no doubt due to the quality of the insulation of the house. Finally, note that in this article we are discussing retrofitting existing buildings. If you are building new, there are many ways to reduce your heating costs to nearly zero and greatly lower your refrigeration or evap consumption. But, that is another story - or at least another article!
For evaporative cooler water use:
See a more complete version of this article, complete with calculations at www.SafeEnergyAnalyst.org
Public Service of New Mexico, PNM, has a study at www.pnm.com/environment/cooling.htm
MM Karpiscak, et. al, Evaporative Cooler Water Use in Phoenix, Journal AWWA, Vol. 90, Issue 4, April 1998, pp. 121-130,
at: http://apps.awwa.org/WaterLibrary/showabstract.aspx?an=JAW_0048135 (for a fee)
For general info on how evaps work:
For water consumption at coal mines:
Black Mesa Project Final EIS, Vol. I Report, DOI FES 08-49, OSM-EIS-33, p. 11, November 2008
Cisterns and Rainwater Harvesting
(Reprinted from the October-December, 2008, Rincon Group Newsletter)
by Charles J. Cole and Carol R. Townsend
as printed in Restoring Connections, the newsletter of Sky Island Alliance
Water is perhaps the scarcest and most precious lifesustaining
resource in the desert and desertgrassland
seas that surround the Sky Islands. With
human population growth increasing, particularly in the
Phoenix and Tucson areas, but also in nearby areas such as
Las Vegas, demand for water will outstrip supply in a matter
of years. Imagine the stampede for bottled water on the day
people open their taps and nothing flows, or the costs to
obtain reliable additional tons of potable water from...where
and how? The well-known problems of flooding in New
Orleans from Hurricane Katrina and the lack of preparedness
for that event make us wonder what preparedness there is
in the arid Southwest for the opposite problem the day when
the water runs out.
Homeowners, architects, builders, and governing bodies can effectively address this problem now by encouraging capture of rainwater off roofs and other places and storing it in large tanks or cisterns. With proper design, implementation, and treatment a single house can have enough pure water for all of its household uses, in the absence of town water or a well. For example, at our house near Tucson our large cistern could have provided 100% of our household needs for two of the last three years, and that includes maintaining a swimming pool. Our builder designed the system by modifying one described by PeterL.Pfeifferin Fine Homebuilding (2001, No. 142, Oct./Nov.issue, pp. 84—89).
The basics of our system are as follows. Rain flows down the metal sloping roof to gutters, then downspouts take the water into underground pipes. These pipes feed it through two filters and then into the cistern, of approximately 26,000 gallon capacity, buried, of swimming-pool-like construction, and covered with a cement top.
When water is needed in the house, a pump sends it out of the cistern, through a 20-micron filter and into a pressure tank, operating automatically, similar to the pump system in a well. From there, it goes through three more filters (a carbon filter, 5-micron sediment filter, and 10-micron carbon-block filter) and passes over an ultra-violet light to kill possible biological contaminants, then into the house. For the water we drink and use for cooking, we also have a small reverse osmosis filter system under the kitchen sink. Annual maintenance of the system requires periodic hosing down of the pre-cistern filters and change of the other filters and UV light bulb.
Although our system was easily installed as part of the original house construction, retrofitting to existing buildings is possible. It is even possible to provision several buildings off a large centralized system or off several smaller ones, as some resorts do in Australia. Some people install inexpensive above-ground water storage tanks, which can be unsightly but also can be hidden behind vine-covered trellises or fences, or within a decorative faux-rock structure such as exhibitors use for natural-looking displays at the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.
Anybody who is seriously interested in learning more about our system is invited to call 520-743-3402 or email email@example.com for an appointment to see it. We are not selling anything and have no personal interest other than to spread the word. Any interested person who sees our system is encouraged to go forward and build a better one and continue to spread the word. The potential is great, as is the need. Arizona has the opportunity to develop and provide leadership in this important area.