Yavapai GroupGrand Canyon Chapter
|
Fall Cattails Reflection |
Yavapai Group HomeContact Us
|
June '09 Newsletter, Yavapai Group
NEW WEB SITE: BUS TOUR PROTEST: SAVE THE VERDE ALLIANCE: SAVE THE VERDE SIGNS CONTEST: Help us have some fun with a series of signs bringing attention to our Save The Verde campaign. We want to erect a series of signs ending with "Save The Verde". Will you enter our contest and suggest some creative signs? Rules: The wording must fit on a 18x54 inch sign; contest ends Aug 31, limit three entries per person; the last sign must always be Panel of judges to be composed of the Excomm with their decisions final. Only one prize awarded per individual, consisting of a one year Sierra membership or renewal. Winners will be published on the website. Send entries to Tom Slaback by email to prescottkid@peoplepc.com. We are looking for landowners to allow us to put up the signs, especially along Hwys 89, 89A, and 69 and will give extra credit in the judging (or one of the memberships) if the entry includes the place to install the signs.
We are in the thick of battle to Save The Verde. Groundwater mining in the Big Chino Aquifer (BCA), the source for 86% of Verde Springs and the base flow of the Upper Verde River, will eventually reduce the Upper Verde to a dry wash flowing only in flood. The BCA is in approximate hydrologic balance now so all future groundwater pumping will further harm the Verde. Pumpers include local residents, very large pending subdivisions, and the City of Prescott. State law granted Prescott the ability to transfer water from the BCA to the Prescott Active Management Area (AMA) and now the AZ Department of Water Resources (ADWR) has written a draft approval for adding that water to Prescott’s Assured Water Supply (AWS). We are appealing that draft; the hearings have taken 6 torturous days and will conclude on June 15/16 in Prescott. Appeals to higher courts will continue for many years. During the hearings, I charged that that ADWR was only concerned with "mechanically applying their rules and didn't care about the river", they responded with "we care about the river but all we can do is to implement our rules". The nature of those rules became clear: Our state water law and the regulations devised to administer it are incredibly awful. In general, Arizona water law is based on an artificial and unscientific distinction between groundwater and surface water. Restrictions on growth are minimal, if any. ADWR is under funded and unduly constrained by regulations. Conservation, sustainability, and environmental concepts are ignored. There are no mitigation requirements. The Gila Adjudication is 30 years old, moves at a snail's pace, and will likely never conclude. Within an AMA, environmental considerations are not allowed in permitting processes. There are no substantive water conservation requirements. Safe Yield by 2025 is a goal not a requirement. Posing as a lofty aim, it permits sacrifice of all natural discharge to springs and rivers; Safe Yield is a joke, a sham, a crumb sold as a loaf. For a 100 year AWS certificate, evaluation criteria are based on current conditions only; future conditions (e.g. climate change) cannot be considered! No AWS has ever been revoked - has one ever been denied? If an AWS is revoked, the lone, weak restriction preventing pumping below 1000' below ground surface disappears, allowing pumpers to mine groundwater as deep as they choose. Delays and weaknesses are built into the permitting process: eg allowing 30,000 new lots after declaring the Prescott AMA out of safe yield. Outside an AMA, water law contains no consideration for pumping effects on neighboring groundwater users, plus even the weak AMA controls don't exist. There is no requirement for subdivisions to have an AWS, and there are no requirements for sustainability or environmental preservation. Arizona water law is worse than clueless – it is actively anti-environmental. It institutionalizes growth while sacrificing our rivers and springs. Arizona’s awful water law is an enormous obstacle to our efforts to Save The Verde. The Prescott Pipeline controversy is merely the first skirmish in a long campaign. After we stop the pipeline, we need to begin acquiring conservation easements on several large ranches destined for development. The campaign to Save The Verde will last for decades, but The River is worth it.
At the last CV Town Council meeting, Director of Water Resources Mark Holmes presented two agenda items relating to this water plan, and both were enthusiastically approved by the council. Low Water Use Landscape Project: I see this demonstration project as a creative and positive response to vigorous criticisms of the landscape water restriction by local landscape contractors and some residents. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Generally, in this voluntary agreement CV declares its intent to do no harm to Verde habitat and the USFWS recognizes CV's need for a reliable water supply. CV recognizes that pumping will effect the river, and the parties agree to work together on water development plan to conserve native species and habitat and to conserve consumptive water use. They declare that transparency in monitoring, planning, data exchange - working together - saves time and money and is more efficient use of taxpayer resources. The parties agree to confer to develop plans to preserve Verde habitat including: a monitoring plan. info exchange, joint funding grants, mitigation plan, effluent recharge study, and a general groundwater model to describe the effects on the river including reflecting effects of climate change and the presence of other water pumpers. If groundwater model indicates a take, CV will consider a HCP/Take permit, agrees to cooperate with USFWS. By approves the MOU, CV may avoid a future potential problem, it's INSURANCE. The MOU/HCP will protect CV from risks caused by Prescott. There were several critical comments about the wrong path Prescott/PV are taking by refusing to prepare a mitigation plan. Karen Fann spoke at length saying that CV will use their BCA water, but they don't want to impact "their neighbors to the north - Paulden - or the Verde Valley Communities. She pointed out that getting sued is expensive, that it is best to work with others so everybody wins. Seems to me that Mayor Karen Fann sees this MOU as the crowning achievement of her service (her term expires soon). The incoming Mayor, Keith Bunker, spoke very approvingly of the agreement. The entire council is very pleased. The MOU was unanimously approved. They gave Mark Holmes a round of applause for the landscape PPP and the MOU. The MOU is tentative in that it does not commit CV to an HCP but it represents tremendous progress. We commend Director Holmes and the CV Council for their cooperative attitude and for acting on their express intent to do no harm to our Verde River. ================ You can choose any project you favor! We'll help you get going. Call or =============== This page was last updated on May 26, 2009 |